Skip to main content

Testing · piloting · independent review

Test Rig and validation

FASO is already piloting the system. Testing and practical experience inform its development; independent validation must separately examine the technical claims and the proposed organisation.

The Test Rig

Check the system. Record the evidence. Learn from faults.

The Test Rig is FASO’s internal testing environment. It checks whether the system performs its intended functions and provides evidence for review and improvement.

Repeatable checks

Repeat testing under defined conditions so results can be examined and compared.

Clear records

Keep an account of what was tested, what happened and any limitations.

Learning from faults

Record problems, investigate them and check that corrections address the failure.

System piloting

Learn from use within a defined scope.

  • Examine reliability and practical usefulness
  • Identify operating demands and issues that need attention
  • Use experience to guide improvements and further testing
  • Keep conclusions within the scope of the pilot

Independent system validation

Put the technical claims to external challenge.

  • Use independently agreed review criteria
  • Examine the strength and limits of the evidence
  • Allow reviewers to confirm, qualify or reject claims
  • Keep the external conclusion independent of FASO

Institutional validation

Test the organisation’s ability to hold its responsibilities.

  • Compare legal and governance options
  • Test responsibility, conflicts and funding independence
  • Examine protection of the public-interest purpose
  • Allow the proposed organisational model to be challenged or rejected

Future governance pilot

Exercise the proposed institution’s decisions in practice.

A governance pilot would test responsibilities, conflicts, publication decisions and incident handling. It is distinct from piloting the technical system.

Explore institutional validation

Proposed independent process

Reviewers must be free to reach their own conclusion.

The proposed independent review should build on evidence from testing and piloting while retaining control of its own assessment and report.

01
Agree the scope

Define what will be assessed, the evidence required and the criteria before the review begins.

02
Challenge the evidence

Examine reliability, limitations and alternative explanations under appropriate information protections.

03
Independent conclusion

The external reviewers control their findings, qualifications and final report.

Follow the programme

See the technical position and the opportunities for review.

The current technical status is maintained on How FASO works. Reviewers can help challenge the evidence and identify what needs further examination.